Tennys Sandgren vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Damm analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sandgren 1 - 0 Damm
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 50.64% of points on his second serve, while Damm has won 48.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damm has won 45.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.82% and 26.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damm has saved 70.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Damm winning 64.63% (W/L 53/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sandgren winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 2 and Damm winning 0. The last match between Sandgren and Damm was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 16-04-2024, First, Clay with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Damm have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sandgren winning 0 times and Damm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 0, and Damm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 291.53 while Damm has played against players with an average rank of 261.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damm has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 32.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damm has converted 33.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
16
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
11
Minor
255
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
179
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (421-325)
Career Total W/L
57% (135-103)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$107,985
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tennys Sandgren | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:10 | 1:48:10 |
1st Serve % | 60% (44/73) | 60% (50/83) |
1st Serve Win% | 82% (36/44) | 66% (33/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 48% (16/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 41% (34/83) | 30% (22/73) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tennys Sandgren | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 52% (14/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (34/21) | 48% (31/33) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (292/260) | 49% (333/340) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 60% (6/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 17% (1/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 64% (7/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.86 | 1.11 |
Aces Total | 232 | 365 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.37 |
DFs Total | 61 | 121 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:31 | 1:49:46 |
Avg Opp Rank | 320.86 | 325.7 |
1st Serve % | 60% (1039/1740) | 59% (1283/2175) |
1st Serve W% | 77% (803/1039) | 77% (992/1283) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (355/701) | 48% (432/892) |
BPs Won% Total | 32% (51/157) | 34% (46/136) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (634/1769) | 33% (688/2078) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 55% (11/9) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 50% (13/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 48% (10/21) |
Deciding Set W% | 27% (3/11) | 64% (7/11) |
1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 83% (12/10) |
1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 17% (12/2) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 20% (15/3) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more